Thursday, January 7, 2010

Retirement Needs If The Average American Is Too Stupid To Plan For Their Own Retirement And Therefore Needs Social Security...?

If the average American is too stupid to plan for their own retirement and therefore needs Social Security...? - retirement needs

... What are we too stupid to do to yourself?

In other words, what should the government for the next?

5 comments:

Stereoty... said...

if the government gave me my independence taxes, I moved like a king. Instead, I get 25K for life. Thieves.

Edition of 65%: Many people do not even come from, what we do in. Anyone who pays 100K almost 15K per year (40 times more complicated). This will give them would be 2.5 million! Those who benefit from those who earn almost nothing, and early payment. It is a redistribution of wealth, and the government uses money from the general fund. Doing research.

B. D Mac said...

It is not necessarily a stupid question. Many people do not understand the investment and as a result of either:

1. You do not invest in all or

2. They are victims of unscrupulous investors and businesses.

Accordingly, we have people who have been uprooted or just a bad investment, since no knowledge of the investment. We take care of hundreds of thousands or even millions of people are poor and homeless, seniors with no one around her. So let's finish it anyway. When paying social security, their own spending and investment by people who have succeeded, at least an idea of what they do.

Much better than the first option.

Health is another program that will benefit the control of the government would. The government could reduce both the maintenance costs of the actual costs.

Government control is not always a bad thing.

65% water said...

Social security should always be complementary rather than a means to reaching retirement age. It assumes that if the screening was not money for social security is bad, because the form was created to take the money that you can rely on

Of course this is not the case, because the program was extended to people more of what they produce, if the money will come today and do not accumulate in our Social Security accounts.

There is no perfect solution, but you can not make people with money and can not be thrown into the street, if it can not work if we are a nation who have no claims are compassion.

digdownd... said...

Social Security is not retired. It is a complement. What are we to say that people are too stupid to save for retirement and they deserve a lifestyle of poor living conditions have to retire. And I have no problem with that. I did not see a problem with people that Social Security taxes is just that ... is a tax! No more and no less. The fact that he assigned to a specific PR ... is simply that it is not because people believe they have the right to return to a set retirement program because they have different expectations about the money of other taxpayers they have to put in. .. so why with them.

and I think particularly amusing when the self is the 15% stake, they have to offer complain if: 1) half of it belongs to the employer. You know why he started his own company, how can the employer do? Well, not all fun and games, and there are costs associated with being the boss! I do not like?Back to work for someone, and they pay 1 / 2. and 2) Most of them are S-Corps and are prevented and completely make that employers from the crowd in a substantial part of their income. Not only will deduct any income tax. They have no problem with tax evasion ... fair tax competition!

digdownd... said...

Social Security is not retired. It is a complement. What are we to say that people are too stupid to save for retirement and they deserve a lifestyle of poor living conditions have to retire. And I have no problem with that. I did not see a problem with people that Social Security taxes is just that ... is a tax! No more and no less. The fact that he assigned to a specific PR ... is simply that it is not because people believe they have the right to return to a set retirement program because they have different expectations about the money of other taxpayers they have to put in. .. so why with them.

and I think particularly amusing when the self is the 15% stake, they have to offer complain if: 1) half of it belongs to the employer. You know why he started his own company, how can the employer do? Well, not all fun and games, and there are costs associated with being the boss! I do not like?Back to work for someone, and they pay 1 / 2. and 2) Most of them are S-Corps and are prevented and completely make that employers from the crowd in a substantial part of their income. Not only will deduct any income tax. They have no problem with tax evasion ... fair tax competition!

Post a Comment